Preclinical Evaluation of Antihypertensive Activity of Combination of Herbs Extract in Wistar Rats
Bhavika D. Satone, Atul A. Deshmukh, Vaishali R. Undale
Department of Pharmacology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research,
Sant Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri, Pune- 411018. (M.S). India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: prof.adeshmukh@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular disease and is a major public health issue in developed as well as developing countries. In hypertension systolic blood pressure (SBP) rises above of 140 mmHg while diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is above of 90 mmHg. Hypertension is one of the leading cause of global burden of disease. It is one of the major cause of cardiovascular mortality, which is estimated to be 1.5 million deaths per year in India. The currently available antihypertensive drugs are not so efficient. Many ayurvedic herbs have shown antihypertensive activity. Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens are two drugs that act on different pathophysiological mechanisms of hypertension. Hence the aim of this study was to evaluate the synergistic potential of the combination in hypertension. Antihypertension activity of combination with doses (100, 200, 400 mg/kg) was carried out with two i.e. 2K1C model and fructose induced hypertension. Biochemical estimations of Triglycerides, LDL, HDL, and Creatinine were carried out along with cardiac parameters like SBP, DBP, And Mean Blood Pressure. The results indicated dose dependent antihypertensive action of combination of drug. The antihypertensive action of combinations was found to be significantly greater than that of individual drugs thereby justifying the synergistic effect of the two drugs.
KEYWORDS: Hypertension, Brassica oleracea, Apium graveolens, 2KC, DBP, SBP.
INTRODUCTION:
Hypertension is defined as a condition in which pressure in the blood vessels is higher than normal (1). Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular disease and is a major public health issue in developed as well as developing countries. In hypertension systolic blood pressure (SBP) rises above of 140 mmHg while diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is above of 90 mmHg. Hypertension is the largest attributable risk factor for mortality worldwide, and is responsible for more than half of all instances of stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD).
The problem is increasing, with predictions that one-third of adults worldwide will have hypertension by 2025. Despite public health programmes and effective pharmacotherapy for hypertension in developed economies, approximately 25% of adults have hypertension. It remains untreated in up to 50% of these individuals, and, disappointingly, BP is controlled to guideline driven targets in only 50% of those hypertensive patients advised to take treatment. Hypertension is generally symptom less, but increases the risk of various other cardiovascular diseases like stroke, heart attack and non-cardiovascular diseases like renal damage, end stage of renal failure, etc. BP rises with increasing age, and this is thought to reflect environmental and lifestyle factors, as well as changes in hemodynamic caused by arterial stiffness in the major elastic arterial vasculature, especially the aorta (Bhagani, et al., 2018). Hypertension is one of the leading cause of global burden of disease. It is one of the major cause of cardiovascular mortality, which is estimated to be 1.5 million deaths per year in India.
MATERIAL AND METHOD:
Animals:
Male wistar rats of weight range 180 to 200 grams were received from Krystal Biological Solutions pvt ltd. They were housed in a clean, well-managed animal house maintained at a temperature of 22±1˚C and 60-70% relative humidity under 12 hours light and 12 hours dark cycle. After acclimatization for 7 days, the mice were divided into 6 groups each group containing 6 rats kept in a polypropylene cage with husk as a bedding material. The animals were provided with food and water adlibitum. The use of animals for the experimental study was approved from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee and all the experiments were carried out between 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Minimization of animal suffering and providing the utmost suitable environment to the animals was taken care of.
Chemicals:
Extracts of Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens were obtained from Green heaven India, Nagpur Maharashtra. Fructose were purchased from Research lab, Mumbai; Methanol purchased from Himeda, Mumbai; Heparin from Caprin, Mumbai; Diethyl ether purchased from Merck, Mumbai; N-Hippuryl-His-Leu hydrate purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Bangalore; Hydrochlorothiazide purchased from Mylan, Mumbai; Urea purchased Research lab fine chem industries, Mumbai; Captopril from Wockhaedt limited, Mumbai.. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade and highest purity.
Instrumentation:
Centrifuge, UV-spectrophotometer, Heating water bath, Sonication water bath, pH meter, Analytical weighing balance, Student biopac lab, Metabolic cage.
Selection of Solvent:
On the basis of solubility study methanol was selected as the solvent for dissolving BO and AG.
Acute Oral Toxicity Study:
After approval from Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), three female rats were housed in polypropylene cage (28 × 21 × 14cm). The combination of Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens was subjected to acute oral toxicity study as per the OECD guidelines 423. After acclimatization for 7 days, three female rats were dosed at a dose of 2000mg/kg (1000 mg/kg of Brassica oleracea and 1000mg/kg of Apium graveolens) of combination. Thereafter the dosed animals were observed for 14 days for any changes in skin, fur, eyes, mucus membrane, behavior and body weight was recorded weekly.
In-Vivo Study: Evalution of antihypertensive activity:
Induction of acute renal hypertension (2K1C):
The method first described by Gold blatt et al. (1934) was used with some modifications. 2K1C (2 Kidneys 1 Clip) was used for the 4-week treatment model due to better animal survivability. For the 2K1C surgery, the rats were anesthetized with urethane (1.5g/kg i.p.) and an incision in the left side of the abdomen was made for renal artery exposure. A silver clip of 0.2mm internal diameter was placed over the left renal artery near the aorta leading to a constriction greater than 50% and the incision was sutured. The rats belonging to group II to group V were treated with 2K1C for the induction of hypertension.
Table No. 1. Protocol for 2KIC
|
Sr. No |
Groups |
Treatment |
No of animals |
|
|
1 |
Group I |
Normal Control (Saline) |
06 |
|
|
2 |
Group II |
2K1C + (Saline) |
06 |
|
|
3 |
Group III |
2K1C + Captopril |
06 |
|
|
4 |
Group IV |
2K1C + Combination of extract(100 mg/kg, p.o) |
06 |
|
|
5 |
Group V |
2K1C + Combination of extract (200 mg/kg, p.o) |
06 |
|
|
6 |
Group VI |
2K1C + Combination of extract (400mg/kg, p.o) |
06 |
|
|
Total Animal |
36 |
|||
After the induction of hypertension different hemodynamic parameters were measured by using carotid artery cannulation invasive method with BIOPAC student’s lab. After measurement of animal the animal was killed by euthanasia.
Fructose Induced Hypertension:
Increase in dietary carbohydrate intake can rise blood pressure in experimental animals. The increase intake of either sucrose or glucose was shown to enhance the development of either spontaneous hypertension or salt hypertension in rats(4,10,12). First reported that hypertension could be induced in normal rats by feeding a high fructose diet. Fructose feeding was also found to cause insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and hypertrigly eridemia in normal rats(5,6), studied that the concentration and duration-dependence of fructose-induced hypertension in rats. Procedure followed for induction of hypertension in animals were housed two per cage on a 12 h light 12-h dark cycle and are allowed free access to standard laboratory diet and drinking fluid. Drinking fluid consists 10% fructose solution. Body weight, food intake of animals measured every week(7).
a) Cardiac parameter:
i) Systolic Blood Pressure
ii) Diastolic Blood Pressure
iii) Mean Arterial Blood Pressure
b) Biochemical Parameters:
i) Triglyceride
ii) LDL
iii) HDL
Table No. 2. Protocol for Fructose Induced Hypertension
|
Sr. No |
Groups |
Treatments |
No of Animals |
|
1 |
Group I |
Normal Saline |
06 |
|
2 |
Group II |
10% fructose p.o |
06 |
|
3 |
Group III |
10% fructose + captopril p.o |
06 |
|
4 |
Group IV |
10% fructose + Combination of extract (100 mg/kg) |
06 |
|
5 |
Group V |
10% fructose + Combination of extract ( 200 mg/kg ) |
06 |
|
6 |
Group VI |
10% fructose + Combination of extract ( 400 mg/kg) |
06 |
|
|
Total |
36 |
|
After the induction of hypertension blood pressure and different biochemical parameters were measured by using carotid artery cannulation invasive method with BIOPAC student’s lab. After measurement of the animal were sacrificed with the help of euthanasia.
Biochemical analysis:
Procedure for Triglycerides Estimation:
Take three cuvette of blank, standard and test respectively. Add 1ml of triglycerides reagent in all 3 cuvette. The triglycerides standard 10ul was added to cuvette having standard and test sample. And add 1ml of triglycerides reagent and standard to test sample cuvette. Prepared sample was mixed and incubated at 37 C0 for 5 minutes. Absorbance of test (T) and standard (S) was taken against reagent blank at 540-560 nm. And calculation has done by using following:
Triglyceride in mg/ dl = Abs.T / Abs.S * 200
Assay Procedure for LDL estimation:
Take three cuvette of blank, standard and test respectively. Add 600ul of LDL-cholesterol-1 reagent in all 3 cuvette. Then 600ul LDL-cholesterol-1 and 200ul LDL-cholesterol-2 and 6ul LDL-C calibrator were added to cuvette having standard sample. And add 600ul of LDL-cholesterol-1 reagent and 200ul LDL-cholesterol-2 to test sample cuvette. Prepared sample was mixed and incubated at 37 C0 for 5 minutes. Absorbance of test (T) and standard (S) was taken against reagent blank at 620 nm. And calculation has done by using following:
LDL (mg/dl) = Abs T / Abs C * Conc. of Calibrate
Assay Procedure for HDL estimation:
Take three cuvette of blank, standard and test respectively. Add 1000ul of HDL-C-cholesterol reagent in all 3 cuvette. Then 10ul HDL-C-calibrator were added to cuvette having standard sample. Prepared sample was mixed and incubated at 37 C0 for 5 minutes. Absorbance of test (T) and standard (S) was taken against reagent blank at 620 nm. And calculation has done by using following:
HDL-C (mg/dl) = Abs T / Abs C * Conc. of Calibrator
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Data was expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The statistical significance of difference between the mean values for the treatment groups was analyzed by One way and Two Way ANOVA (analysis of variance) followed by Bonferroni test using Graph pad prism-7 software.
Results- in-vitro study
ACE inhibition:
Both Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens have beean reported for their ACE (Angiotensin converting enzyme) inhibitory activity. Hence the combination of both was tested to determine the inhibition of ACE in terms of Inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50). The IC 50 value of Brassica Oleracea was found to be 520.03 and Apium graveolens was found to be 400.22 and combination of both was found to be 350.32
In-Vivo Study -Acute Oral Toxicity:
Acute oral toxicity study of the combination of Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens in (1: 1) was done according to OECD guidelines 423. The combination was found to be safe up to a dose of 2000 mg/kg as indicative from no significant changes in the bod weight, skin, fur, eyes, mucus membrane, salivation and other physiological and behavioral parameters of dosed rats, observed during a period of 14 days. Therefore the combination of Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens was found to be safe up to a dose of 2000 mg/kg.
Induction of Acute Renal Hypertension (2k1c):
Cardiac Parameter
Fig. No. 1: Effect of drug on systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure
Biochemical Parameter
Fig. No. 2: Effect of drug on different biochemical parameters
Antihypertensive Activity of Fructose Induced Hypertension
Fig. No. 3: Effect of drug on systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure
Biochemical Parameter
Fig. No. 4: Effect of drug on different biochemical parameters
Histopathology:
Microscopic examination of Kidneys showed minimal multifocal infiltration of inflammatory cells to belong to G2, G3, G4, G5 and G6 groups did not show any change when compared with control group. On the basis of histopathology findings, it can be concluded that animals belongs to disease control showed Kidneys changes.
Fig. No. 5: Individual kidney ection from each group
DISCUSSION:
Hypertension is one of the commonly occurring disease both developed and developing countries. Community surveys in industrialized countries have shown a prevalence of 15-33% in persons aged 30 years. The disease continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality from coronary artery disease and stroke, In this respect, herbal drugs are helpful and render encouraging results in comparison to synthetic drugs due to their fewer or no side effects and easy availability. The screening of various plants according to their traditional uses and nutritional value based on their therapeutic value leads to discovery of newer and safer alternative drug treatment for management of hypertension.
In present study polyherbal mixture of two selected herbs was evaluated for antihypertensive activity. The two herbs selected were Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens. The broccoli contains vitamin C, glucosinolate and flavonoids and it reported as an antioxidant, antihypertensive, ACE inhibitor. While Celery seeds contains anthocyanin, chlorophyll, carotenoids, limonene, sedanelodis, 3-butylphthalide and it reported as calcium channel blockers, vasodilator, and ACE inhibitor. As these two herbs are reported to act on different mechanisms that are responsible for hypertension, the effect of combination of these two herbs was done and evaluated for antihypertensive activity. The phytochemical studies was conducted by detecting presence of qurcetin and rutin as biomarkers in the polyherbal mixture showed the presence of most of the biologically active compounds in the plant and stable in polyherbal mixture. In-vitro assay of both the drugs was performed for their ACE inhibition activity, the IC50 of combination was found to be lesser than individual drugs. So what additive effect or lesser concentration of both is useful.
Model used to evaluate antihypertensive activity is (2K1C) is a renovascular type animal model for hypertension. In 2K1C model, the renal artery is constricted on only one side while the other artery (or kidney) left untouched. This results in a sustained increase in BP due to increased plasma rennin activity, which in turn increases circulating angiotensin‑II, and it is potent vasoconstrictor(19). However, there is no salt and water retention because other kidney being intact. Thus, the resultant hypertension at this stage is renin‑angiotensin dependent only. Moreover, it has been shown that other vasoactive agents may also be involved in producing hypertension in 2K1C, such as: Thromboxane and prostaglandin F2α. In renovascular hypertension, there is an alteration in sympathetic function with increased sympathetic drive and impaired catecholamine’s extraction. The sympathetic nervous activity may be augmented by the angiotensinergic mechanism in 2K1C hypertension(20)
In present study the polyherbal formulation at dose 200 mg/kg and 400mg/kg significantly reduced the blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure wherein dose 400mg/kg was found to be more effective than 200 mg/kg as compare to hypertensive rats. These findings suggest that Polyherbal Mixture may act via ACE inhibitor activity and thereby block or antagonises the action of angiotensin II. Another model reveals the evaluation of antihypertensive activity in fructose induced hypertension. Following ingestion, fructose is rapidly absorbed from the intestine via the fructose-specific glucose transporter, GLUT5 (L.T Tran et al., 2009). High fructose feeding play role on endothelial dysfunction, nitric oxide, renin system, sympathetic nervous system, oxidative stress, uric acid. High fructose diet up-regulate sodium and chloride transporters therefore resulting salt overload and increases blood pressure(6).
The polyherbal mixture of extracts at dose level of 200 mg/kg and 400mg/kg exhibited significant diuretics activity. Also increased volume and concentration of Na+, K+ and Cl− in urine when compared to the normal control group was observed. The lipid parameters like HDL, LDL, and Triglyceride, plays an important role in cardiovascular diseases. Increase LDL is associated with increase in risk of morbidity and mortality the herbs used in polyherbal are reported to decrease lipid parameter individually but the effect of combination of these herb is not reported. In the presence study serum lipid parameters were measured. No significant difference in the lipid parameter as compared group as well as standard was observed these suggest the polyherbal mixture do not produce significant effect on lipid metabolism.
CONCLUSION:
The present study was undertaken with the aim to evaluate the antihypertensive activity of combination of herbs extract Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens in 2K1C model and fructose induced hypertension model in Wistar rats. The antihypertensive potential of Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens were evaluated in terms of LDL, Triglycerides, Creatinine, HDL status in rats. The outcome of the present study reveals that both the drugs significantly inhibited ACE enzyme activity. Both the drugs was able to decrease LDL, Triglycerides, Creatinine and increase in HDL level in Wistar rats. Combination of two drugs showed antihypertensive activity in dose dependent manner. The dose 400mg/kg was found to be more effective than 100 mg/kg and 200mg/kg. Conclusively, based on findings of present study it can be stated that the Brassica oleracea and Apium graveolens could be a potential source for the treatment and management of antihypertension.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
The authors are thankful to Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pimpri, Pune and to Dr. S. R. Naik, Adjunct Professor, and DYPIPSR.
REFERENCES:
1. Dr. Kandelwal KR. Practical Pharmacognosy. 11th ed. Nirali Prakashan, Pune. June, 2004; 149-56.
2. Ghelani HS, Patel BM, Gokani RH, Rachchh MA. Evaluation of polyherbal formulation (SJT-HT-03) for antihypertensive activity in albino rats. Ayu. 2014 Oct; 35(4):452.
3. Goldblatt H, Lynch J, Hanzal RF, Summerville WW. Studies on experimental hypertension: I. The production of persistent elevation of systolic blood pressure by means of renal ischemia. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1934 Mar 1; 59(3):347-79.
4. Hwang IS, Ho HE, Hoffman BB, Reaven GM. Fructose-induced insulin resistance and hypertension in rats. Hypertension. 1987 Nov; 10(5):512-6.
5. Tobey TA, Mondon CE, Zavaroni I, Reaven GM. Mechanism of insulin resistance in fructose-fed rats. Metabolism. 1982 Jun 1; 31(6):608-12.
6. Dai S, McNeill JH. Fructose-induced hypertension in rats is concentration-and duration-dependent. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods. 1995 Apr 1; 33(2):101-7.
7. H. Gerhard Vogel. Drug discovery and evaluation. Springer Publication 2nd edition. March 2002 (176).
8. Vogel HG, Vogel WH, editors. Drug discovery and evaluation: pharmacological assays. Springer Science and Business Media; 2013 Apr 17.
9. Touyz RM, Schiffrin EL. Role of endothelin in human hypertension. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2003 Jun 1; 81(6):533-41.
10. Tran LT, Yuen VG, McNeill JH. The fructose-fed rat: a review on the mechanisms of fructose-induced insulin resistance and hypertension. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2009 Dec 1; 332(1-2):145-59.
11. Dai S, McNeill JH. Fructose-induced hypertension in rats is concentration-and duration-dependent. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods. 1995 Apr 1; 33(2):101-7.
12. Sigmon DH, Beierwaltes WH. Renal nitric oxide and angiotensin II interaction in renovascular hypertension. Hypertension. 1993 Aug; 22(2):237-42.
13. Hsueh WC, Mitchell BD, Schneider JL, Wagner MJ, Bell CJ, Nanthakumar E, Shuldiner AR. QTL influencing blood pressure maps to the region of PPH1 on chromosome 2q31-34 in Old Order Amish. Circulation. 2000 Jun 20; 101(24):2810-6.
14. Oparil S, Zaman MA, Calhoun DA. Pathogenesis of hypertension. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2003 Nov 4; 139(9):761-76.
15. Corvol P, Persu A, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Jeunemaitre X. Seven lessons from two candidate genes in human essential hypertension: angiotensinogen and epithelial sodium channel. Hypertension. 1999 Jun; 33(6):1324-31.
16. Hunt SC, Ellison RC, Atwood LD, Pankow JS, Province MA, Leppert MF. Genome scans for blood pressure and hypertension: The national heart, lung, and blood institute family heart study. Hypertension. 2002 Jul 1; 40(1):1-6.
17. Sontia B, Mooney J, Gaudet L, Touyz RM. Pseudohyperaldosteronism, liquorice, and hypertension. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2008 Feb; 10(2):153-7.
18. Sinclair AM, Isles CG, Brown I, Cameron H, Murray GD, Robertson JW. Secondary hypertension in a blood pressure clinic. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1987 Jul 1; 147(7):1289-93.
19. Borkowski KR, Quinn P. Adrenaline and the development of spontaneous hypertension in rats. Journal of Autonomic Pharmacology. 1985 Jun; 5(2):89-100.
20. Zachary I, Rozengurt E. Focal adhesion kinase (p125FAK): a point of convergence in the action of neuropeptides, integrins, and oncogenes. Cell. 1992 Dec 11; 71(6):891-4
Received on 20.07.2019 Modified on 05.09.2019
Accepted on 16.11.2019 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2020; 13(5):2069-2075.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00372.8